Skip to content
Never again

A promise that became a duty

After 1945 the world vowed “never again.” Srebrenica showed that vow can be broken even in Europe. Remembrance means placing that crime in a wider record of genocides and of atrocities that still demand attention.

The vow

After the Holocaust, a commandment

In the shadow of the Holocaust, states adopted the 1948 Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide. “Never again” was meant not as a slogan but as a legal and moral commandment: to prevent, to punish, and to refuse silence.

In July 1995, more than 8,000 Bosniak men and boys were murdered in and around Srebrenica — a United Nations “safe area.” International courts later established that those crimes constituted genocide. The enclave fell under the eyes of the world; the promise made after 1945 was broken on European soil.

Srebrenica does not stand alone in history. It stands in a continuum of mass atrocity — some adjudicated as genocide, others recognized or still under investigation. To remember Srebrenica honestly is to refuse selective memory.

Adjudicated

Genocides established in law

Cases in which international or domestic courts, or the settled record of international justice, have established genocide or its equivalent finding. Links lead to memorial and documentation institutions.

1933–1945

The Holocaust

The systematic murder of six million Jews by Nazi Germany and its collaborators — the crime that gave the Genocide Convention its urgency. Yad Vashem, the World Holocaust Remembrance Center in Jerusalem, documents, commemorates, and researches the Shoah.

1994

Rwanda — genocide against the Tutsi

In about one hundred days, more than 800,000 Tutsi and moderate Hutu were murdered. The ICTR and later courts established genocide. The Kigali Genocide Memorial is a place of burial, remembrance, and education.

1975–1979

Cambodia — Khmer Rouge

Under the Khmer Rouge, roughly a quarter of Cambodia’s population died through execution, starvation, and forced labour. The Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia (ECCC) tried senior leaders; Tuol Sleng (S-21) stands as a primary site of documentation and memory.

1995

Srebrenica

ICTY and ICJ rulings established that the massacres of July 1995 constituted genocide. Over 8,372 victims are commemorated; the Potočari Memorial Center remains the central place of burial and annual remembrance.

Documented

Recognized and under international scrutiny

Atrocities widely documented as genocide or subject to international legal proceedings — even where final court judgments may still be pending.

1915

Armenian Genocide

The mass deportation and killing of Armenians in the Ottoman Empire during the First World War. Widely recognized by historians and many states as genocide. The Armenian Genocide Museum-Institute in Yerevan preserves testimony and research.

2003–

Darfur

Mass violence in Darfur, Sudan, led the UN Security Council to refer the situation to the International Criminal Court. The ICC has issued warrants and pursued cases concerning genocide, crimes against humanity, and war crimes.

2016–

Rohingya — Myanmar

In The Gambia v. Myanmar, the International Court of Justice is hearing a case under the Genocide Convention concerning the Rohingya. The Independent Investigative Mechanism for Myanmar (IIMM) collects and preserves evidence of the most serious international crimes.

Evidence on Myanmar and the Rohingya is also preserved by the Independent Investigative Mechanism for Myanmar. IIMM · Enter →

Ongoing

Crises still before the world

Where proceedings, investigations, or authoritative assessments are active. Language below follows institutional findings — not slogans.

On the record

The following statements summarize findings and proceedings of named international bodies. They are not a substitute for court judgments still pending, nor for reading the primary sources.

Gaza

In December 2023 South Africa instituted proceedings against Israel before the International Court of Justice (Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide in the Gaza Strip — South Africa v. Israel). On 26 January 2024 the Court indicated provisional measures, ordering Israel, among other steps, to take all measures within its power to prevent acts within the scope of the Genocide Convention and to enable humanitarian assistance. The case remains before the Court.

In September 2025 the United Nations Independent International Commission of Inquiry on the Occupied Palestinian Territory, including East Jerusalem, and Israel concluded that genocide is being committed against Palestinians in Gaza. The Commission’s report is published through the UN human rights system.

A wider scholarly assessment has also taken shape: in August 2025 the International Association of Genocide Scholars (IAGS) adopted a resolution stating that Israel’s policies and actions in Gaza meet the legal definition of genocide under the 1948 Convention. Humanitarian conditions and needs are tracked by UN OCHA and related agencies.

Uyghurs — Xinjiang

In August 2022 the UN Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR) published an assessment of human rights concerns in the Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region. It concluded that the extent of arbitrary and discriminatory detention of Uyghurs and other predominantly Muslim groups, in a context of broader rights deprivations, may constitute international crimes, in particular crimes against humanity — and that the situation requires urgent attention.

OHCHR assessment (2022) · Enter →
Duty

What remembrance demands

Remembrance is not only mourning. It is the refusal of denial, the naming of warning signs, and the insistence that “never again” applies without exception of geography or politics.

The United Nations Office on Genocide Prevention and the Responsibility to Protect works to advance early warning and prevention. Its framework of analysis for atrocity crimes exists so that patterns of dehumanization, persecution, and preparation can be recognized before mass killing is complete.

For Srebrenica, denial remains a living harm. For every people still at risk, silence is not neutrality. To remember the dead of July 1995 is to stand with the living who face the same machinery of destruction — and to hold institutions and states to the law they wrote after 1945.

UN Office on Genocide Prevention · Enter →

On the record

“The tragedy of Srebrenica will haunt our history forever.”

— Kofi AnnanSecretary-General of the United Nations — Report on the fall of Srebrenica, A/54/549 (15 November 1999)

Never again is a duty

To remember Srebrenica is to refuse denial everywhere — and to act before the next safe area falls.